Joint letter – ICC reform and expansion risks diverting ETS Revenues from real climate action
In light of the European Commission’s ongoing considerations to amend the ETS State Aid Guidelines, revising the rules for Indirec...
News
Publish date: September 11, 2013
News
The endorsed report includes a proposal to measure the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions resulting from indirect land use change (ILUC) from 2020. The Parliament’s environment committee initially wanted ILUC factors to be included in both the Renewable Energy Directive (RED) and the Fuel Quality Directive (FQD). Inclusion in the RED amendment would require Member States to achieve their renewable energy targets using only fuels proven to have a low ILUC impact, and to do so within two or three years. The vote, however, only favoured ILUC inclusion in the FQD, and ILUC is therefore set to only be considered as of 2020.
Campaigning groups have been clear about the negative effects of ILUC, often resulting directly from the EU’s biofuels policy. But industry has been equally vocal in its skepticism of ILUC methodologies’ soundness, calling for further studies before binding policies are made.
The plenary vote also endorsed a 6 % limit on first generation (i.e. crop based) biofuels counting toward the EU’s 2020 target of 10% of energy in transport stemming from renewable sources. This raises the 5 % limit initially proposed last year by the European Commission, but also lowers the 6,5% limit proposed by the Parliament’s industry committee. The industry committee also proposed a sub target of 2,5% for advanced biofuels, such as waste residues or fuels produced from algae, which have significantly lower GHG emissions. This was also endorsed in the 11 September vote. This is a welcome incentive for advanced biofuels, but more could and should be done.
It is clear that the report that went through the European Parliament today is indeed a compromise. What remains to be seen is whether it will be a constructive and workable one, or whether it will produce a new set of complications akin to the ones it has just addressed.
MEPs voted by just one vote against starting negotiations with the European Council, meaning the legislation will now go to a second reading and further tangible progress is unlikely until after European elections in May 2014.
The vote follows a plenary debate held on Monday and a public debate held last week in Brussels (read more here).
In light of the European Commission’s ongoing considerations to amend the ETS State Aid Guidelines, revising the rules for Indirec...
On March 10th 2026, the Commission presented the Clean Energy Investment Strategy, as part of an Energy package to boost investment in homegrown cle...
By Amélie Laurent, CDR Policy Advisor, Bellona Europa Published in REVOLVE Today, EU countries approved Europe’s 2040 climate target:...
The new EU Ports Strategy rightly recognises that ports are no longer just logistics hubs – they are be...
Three main asks: Set robust low-carbon definitions as soon as possible: Without clear thresholds, non-price criteria in procurement lack the dec...
Get our latest news