Joint letter – ICC reform and expansion risks diverting ETS Revenues from real climate action
In light of the European Commission’s ongoing considerations to amend the ETS State Aid Guidelines, revising the rules for Indirec...
News
Publish date: February 14, 2006
News
Preliminary studies do however show that the amount of oil available for the project could be too little, BarentsObserver reported. The last years’ build-up of oil export infrastructure in the Russian North could have made the construction of the pipeline and terminal project superfluous. Transneft seriously started to study the project in spring 2004, when experts found a suited site for the export terminal.
One year ago deputy head of the company, Sergey Grigoriev, said that his company could construct the pipeline from Kharyaga to Indiga, as well as the terminal, within 2 years. According to him, construction costs would amount to 2.1 billion dollars. Transneft has made significant changes in the project since then. Projected capacity of the pipeline is now decreased from 24 million tons per year to 12 million tons. The estimated price for the construction is also significantly increased. The expected cost of the project is 3.5 billion dollars.
In light of the European Commission’s ongoing considerations to amend the ETS State Aid Guidelines, revising the rules for Indirec...
In this week of industrial discussions, first at the Antwerp Industry Summit on February 12th and then at the informal EU leaders’ mee...
Ahead of the European Commission’s Industrial Accelerator Act proposal on February 25th, Bellona has joined 40 organisations from across indust...
Policy Roundtable Takeaways On December 18th, 2025, Bellona organised a policy roundtable gathering the Swedish construction value chain, public p...
On 1 January 2026, Cyprus assumed the Presidency of the Council of the European Union, concluding the current trio at a pivotal moment for EU climate...
Get our latest news