Joint letter – ICC reform and expansion risks diverting ETS Revenues from real climate action
In light of the European Commission’s ongoing considerations to amend the ETS State Aid Guidelines, revising the rules for Indirec...
News
Publish date: March 31, 2015
News
Bellona is deeply disappointed with last week’s failure of the GCF to ban funding to fossil fuel projects. It acts to undermine the very objective of the fund, which is namely to make a significant and ambitious contribution to the global efforts towards attaining the goals set by the international community, within the framework of the UNFCCC, to combat climate change.
Director of Bellona Europa, Jonas Helseth, said: “Bellona strongly disapproves of any UN climate funding being directed towards the construction of unabated coal power plants as they lock in fossil emissions that go counter to global decarbonisation objectives. On the other hand, Bellona is pleased that the development of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology is among the list of supported activities under the GCF. We would therefore ask that the Board takes steps to ensure that funding is granted only to coal plants equipped with CCS.”
An initial resource mobilisation effort for the fund began in June 2014. Following a formal pledge meeting in late November and at the Climate Summit in Lima, COP 20, a total of €9 billion was brought in. However, the outlook for the fund isn’t looking very bright, as only about 1% of the amount pledged has been delivered to date and the deadline for contributions was this week (March 30).
What is more, with the currently ambiguous rules on eligibility criteria, the resources made available by the fund are at risk of being channeled towards heavily polluting coal power plants.
Japan has already confirmed these fears by designating nearly €1 billion in loans for coal plants in Indonesia as ‘climate finance’, as reported by the Associated Press. Moreover, only last week, Japan added another €580 million in loans for coal plants in India and Bangladesh. To justify these actions, Japan claims that these projects qualify as ‘clean energy’ as they are less polluting than older coal-fired plants. China and Saudi Arabia also consider coal plants eligible under the fund and would oppose a prohibition of this.
In light of the European Commission’s ongoing considerations to amend the ETS State Aid Guidelines, revising the rules for Indirec...
On March 10th 2026, the Commission presented the Clean Energy Investment Strategy, as part of an Energy package to boost investment in homegrown cle...
By Amélie Laurent, CDR Policy Advisor, Bellona Europa Published in REVOLVE Today, EU countries approved Europe’s 2040 climate target:...
The new EU Ports Strategy rightly recognises that ports are no longer just logistics hubs – they are be...
Three main asks: Set robust low-carbon definitions as soon as possible: Without clear thresholds, non-price criteria in procurement lack the dec...
Get our latest news